Il n'y a aucun doute que ce fut une décision difficile à prendre par la Cour de district de Vänersborg. Le JugeGunnar Krantz a commencé par parler de l'importance de Saab pour la Suède ouest et pour tant de gens quidépendent du succès de Saab.
«Le procès doit encore être en conformité avec les exigences imposées par la loi. Le tribunal de district dans son évaluation a conclu que les exigences de la loi ne sont pas respectées ", a déclaré le juge Gunnar Krantz à la conférence de presse durant laquelle la Cour de district de Vänersborg a rendu public sa décision de ne pas valider la requête soumise par Saab .
Saab n'a pas réussi dans son application à la reconstruction à convaincre le tribunal que l'entreprise peut économiser.
«Une condition de la reconstruction est que la société ne peuvent pas payer leurs arriérés. Cette exigence est satisfaite. Mais il ya une exigence supplémentaire. Il doit y avoir un espoir raisonnable bien-fondé que les problèmes peuvent être résolus ", a déclaré Gunnar Krantz.
Dans sa demande, Saab souligne que l'accord a été conclu avec les deux sociétés chinoises, Youngman et Pang Da, soumise à une validation par la autorités chinoises. Mais le tribunal de district estime qu'il est difficile de savoir si la société peut compter sur ces fonds.
«Cet aspect du dossier est flou. Rien n'est dit sur le moment où la validation peut être prévue par les autorités chinoises. Nous ne savons même pas si les demandes ont été déposées. On parle aussi d'autres solutions financières. Les données sur cette question est très evasive », a déclaré Gunnar Krantz.
Il est également difficile de savoir si le financement prévu est suffisant pour résoudre la crise des liquidités et la poursuite des opérations, estime que le tribunal de district.
Le tribunal de district a également inclus les récents événements dans son évaluation.
"La production est à quelques exceptions près, au point mort depuis Mars. Le verdict du tribunal de district, est que cet arrêt a affaibli la marque Saab et qu'il altère les possibilités de réussir dans son métier de base ", a déclaré Gunnar Krantz.
Quand on lui demande comment il se sent d'avoir pris la décision de refuser la demande de Saab, a déclaré Gunnar Krantz:
«C'est évidemment une décision très difficile à prendre. Mais peut-être que l'on peut aussi voir l'avenir avec optimisme. L'histoire montre que lorsqu'une entreprise ferme ses portes,c'est généralement un terrain fertile pour d'autres affaires. "
"Everybody understands that this is a very heavy decision to make," said Judge Gunnar Krantz in connection with the case.
There is no doubt that this was a difficult decision by the District Court of Vänersborg. Judge Gunnar Krantz began by talking about the importance of Saab in West of Sweden and for so many people that depend on the success of Saab.
"The trial has yet to comply with the requirements imposed by law. The district court's assessment concluded that the statutory requirements are not met, "said the judge Gunnar Krantz in the press conference during which the District Court of Vänersborg released its decision not to validate the request submitted by Saab.
There is no doubt that this was a difficult decision by the District Court of Vänersborg. Judge Gunnar Krantz began by talking about the importance of Saab in West of Sweden and for so many people that depend on the success of Saab.
"The trial has yet to comply with the requirements imposed by law. The district court's assessment concluded that the statutory requirements are not met, "said the judge Gunnar Krantz in the press conference during which the District Court of Vänersborg released its decision not to validate the request submitted by Saab.
Saab has failed in its application to reconstruction to convince the court that the company can save money.
"A condition of the reconstruction is that the company can not pay their arrears. This requirement is met. But there is an additional requirement. There must be a reasonable expectation that the merits issues can be resolved, "said Gunnar Krantz.
In its application, Saab said that the agreement was signed with two Chinese companies, Youngman and Pang Da, subject to approval by the Chinese authorities. But the district court finds it difficult to know whether the company can count on these funds.
"This aspect of the case is unclear. Nothing is said about when validation may be provided by the Chinese authorities. We do not even know if the applications were filed. We also talk about other financial solutions. The data on this issue is very evasive, "said Gunnar Krantz.
It is also unclear whether the funding provided is sufficient to solve the liquidity crisis and continued operations, said the district court.
"A condition of the reconstruction is that the company can not pay their arrears. This requirement is met. But there is an additional requirement. There must be a reasonable expectation that the merits issues can be resolved, "said Gunnar Krantz.
In its application, Saab said that the agreement was signed with two Chinese companies, Youngman and Pang Da, subject to approval by the Chinese authorities. But the district court finds it difficult to know whether the company can count on these funds.
"This aspect of the case is unclear. Nothing is said about when validation may be provided by the Chinese authorities. We do not even know if the applications were filed. We also talk about other financial solutions. The data on this issue is very evasive, "said Gunnar Krantz.
It is also unclear whether the funding provided is sufficient to solve the liquidity crisis and continued operations, said the district court.
It is also unclear whether the funding provided is sufficient to solve the liquidity crisis and continued operations, said the district court.
The District Court also included the recent events in his assessment.
"Production is with few exceptions, stopped since March. The verdict of the district court, is that this decision has weakened the Saab brand and it alters the potential to succeed in its core business," said Gunnar Krantz.
When asked how it feels to have made the decision to refuse the request for Saab, said Gunnar Krantz:
"It's obviously a very difficult decision to make. But perhaps we can also see the future with optimism. History shows that when a business closes, it is usually a breeding ground for other cases. "
The District Court also included the recent events in his assessment.
"Production is with few exceptions, stopped since March. The verdict of the district court, is that this decision has weakened the Saab brand and it alters the potential to succeed in its core business," said Gunnar Krantz.
When asked how it feels to have made the decision to refuse the request for Saab, said Gunnar Krantz:
"It's obviously a very difficult decision to make. But perhaps we can also see the future with optimism. History shows that when a business closes, it is usually a breeding ground for other cases. "
Aucun commentaire :
Enregistrer un commentaire